The Algorithmic Allure Where Smart Money Meets the
The hum in the digital ether is growing louder, a symphony of code and capital orchestrating a revolution. It’s the sound of "smart money" making its deliberate, calculated entrance into the blockchain space. Forget the wild west narratives of early crypto days; the landscape has matured. Today, sophisticated investors, institutional powerhouses, and seasoned venture capitalists are not just dipping their toes in the blockchain waters – they're diving headfirst, armed with deep pockets, cutting-edge analytics, and a keen understanding of the transformative power of decentralized technology. This isn't about chasing fleeting hype; it's about identifying foundational shifts, backing disruptive innovation, and strategically positioning themselves for the long haul.
What exactly constitutes "smart money" in this context? It's more than just a large sum. It signifies capital that is informed, strategic, and often arrives with a significant degree of influence. These are the players who possess a profound grasp of market dynamics, technological potential, and regulatory currents. They are the venture capital firms that meticulously vet projects, the hedge funds that employ complex algorithmic trading strategies, and the corporate giants that integrate blockchain into their core operations. Their involvement signals a transition from speculative fervor to a more grounded, utility-driven adoption. They understand that blockchain, at its core, is not just about digital currencies; it's about creating more efficient, transparent, and secure systems for a myriad of applications, from supply chain management and digital identity to intellectual property rights and beyond.
The allure of blockchain for smart money lies in its inherent promise of disintermediation and radical efficiency. Traditional financial systems, while robust, are often encumbered by legacy infrastructure, bureaucratic layers, and inherent inefficiencies. Blockchain offers a paradigm shift: a distributed, immutable ledger that can facilitate peer-to-peer transactions without the need for central authorities. This drastically reduces transaction costs, speeds up settlement times, and enhances transparency. For investors, this translates into opportunities to back companies building the next generation of financial infrastructure, to invest in assets with newfound liquidity and programmability, and to participate in entirely new economic models.
Venture capital, in particular, has been a critical catalyst in this evolution. Firms that once shied away from the perceived risks of the crypto space are now actively deploying significant capital into blockchain startups. They are looking beyond just cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets, focusing on foundational blockchain protocols, decentralized applications (dApps) that solve real-world problems, and the infrastructure that will support the burgeoning Web3 ecosystem. These VC investments are not passive; they often come with strategic guidance, access to talent networks, and a vested interest in the long-term success of the portfolio companies. The due diligence process is rigorous, involving deep dives into the technology’s scalability, security, tokenomics, team expertise, and market viability. The presence of reputable VC backing lends legitimacy to projects, attracting further investment and talent.
Institutional investors, initially cautious, have also begun to acknowledge the undeniable traction of blockchain technology. Asset managers are exploring ways to offer exposure to digital assets to their clients, while some are even allocating a portion of their portfolios to cryptocurrencies and other blockchain-based investments. This shift is driven by a growing understanding that digital assets are becoming an increasingly important part of the global financial landscape. The development of regulated investment vehicles, such as Bitcoin ETFs, has been instrumental in bridging the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world, making it easier and safer for institutions to participate. Furthermore, the potential for tokenization – the process of representing real-world assets like real estate, art, or even company shares on a blockchain – opens up entirely new avenues for liquidity and fractional ownership, which is particularly attractive to large-scale investors seeking diversification and new investment opportunities.
The "smart money" narrative is also deeply intertwined with the concept of decentralization itself. While the initial wave of blockchain adoption was often characterized by decentralized, community-driven projects, the arrival of sophisticated capital brings with it a different dynamic. These investors often seek to build scalable, sustainable businesses. This can sometimes lead to a tension between pure decentralization and the need for governance, structure, and effective management. However, it's precisely this strategic involvement that is helping to refine and professionalize the blockchain industry, pushing projects to focus on clear use cases, robust economic models, and long-term value creation. They are betting on the idea that blockchain technology, guided by intelligent capital, can indeed reshape industries and redefine how we interact with digital and physical assets. The journey is far from over, but the presence of "smart money" signals a new era of maturity, innovation, and profound potential for the blockchain frontier.
The algorithms themselves are becoming a key differentiator for smart money in blockchain. Beyond just identifying promising projects, these sophisticated investors are leveraging advanced analytical tools and machine learning to navigate the volatile crypto markets. This includes developing proprietary trading algorithms that can execute trades at lightning speed, capitalizing on micro-second price discrepancies and market inefficiencies. These algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data – on-chain metrics, social media sentiment, news feeds, and historical price action – to identify patterns and predict future price movements. This algorithmic approach is a hallmark of traditional finance, and its increasing application within the blockchain space signifies a professionalization of the market.
For smart money, the tokenization of assets represents a frontier brimming with opportunity. Imagine a world where a piece of fine art, a commercial property, or even a share in a private company can be represented as a digital token on a blockchain. This process, known as tokenization, promises to unlock unprecedented liquidity for traditionally illiquid assets. It allows for fractional ownership, meaning that multiple investors can own a piece of a high-value asset, thereby democratizing access to investments that were once out of reach for most. Smart money players are actively exploring and investing in the platforms and infrastructure that facilitate tokenization, recognizing its potential to revolutionize asset management and create entirely new markets. They are meticulously evaluating the legal frameworks, the security protocols, and the market demand for tokenized assets, aiming to be at the forefront of this transformative trend.
The concept of "DeFi," or Decentralized Finance, is another significant magnet for smart money. DeFi aims to recreate traditional financial services – lending, borrowing, trading, insurance – on decentralized blockchain networks, removing intermediaries and empowering users with greater control over their assets. Smart money is drawn to the potential for higher yields, greater transparency, and the innovative financial products emerging within the DeFi ecosystem. They are investing in DeFi protocols, liquidity pools, and the underlying infrastructure that makes these decentralized financial applications possible. However, with this opportunity comes risk, and smart money is also keenly aware of the security vulnerabilities and regulatory uncertainties that still characterize parts of the DeFi space. Their involvement often involves actively contributing to the development of more robust and secure DeFi solutions, sometimes through direct investment, other times through participation in governance.
The journey of smart money into blockchain is not without its complexities. As capital becomes more concentrated, questions arise about the potential for increased centralization and the impact on the core ethos of decentralization that underpins much of the blockchain movement. The influence wielded by large investors can shape project roadmaps, token distribution, and even governance outcomes. This necessitates a careful balance between leveraging the power of smart money for growth and innovation, while preserving the principles of fairness, transparency, and community ownership. Smart money, by its very nature, seeks returns and influence. Understanding how these forces interact with the open-source, permissionless nature of blockchain is key to appreciating the ongoing evolution of this dynamic ecosystem.
Furthermore, the regulatory landscape remains a crucial factor influencing the decisions of smart money. As institutional adoption grows, so does the scrutiny from regulators worldwide. Smart money players are keenly following regulatory developments, investing in projects that demonstrate a strong commitment to compliance and security. They understand that regulatory clarity is essential for the long-term sustainability and mainstream adoption of blockchain technology. Their involvement can even influence regulatory discussions, as their experience and insights help shape policies that balance innovation with investor protection.
In essence, the infusion of smart money into blockchain is a testament to the technology’s maturation and its undeniable potential. It signifies a shift from a niche, speculative pursuit to a significant force reshaping global finance and technology. The strategies are becoming more sophisticated, the investments more deliberate, and the impact increasingly profound. As these intelligent capital flows continue to navigate the blockchain frontier, they are not just participating in the market; they are actively building its future, one strategic investment at a time, guided by algorithms, a vision for tokenized assets, and the transformative power of decentralized finance.
The influx of "smart money" into the blockchain sphere is far more than a mere trend; it’s a seismic shift that underscores the technology's evolution from a fringe concept to a foundational pillar of future economies. This isn't about the speculative frenzies of yesteryear, where fortunes were made and lost on the whims of volatile markets. Instead, it signifies a calculated embrace by sophisticated investors who understand the underlying value proposition of distributed ledger technology. These are the titans of industry, the venture capital juggernauts, and the institutional behemoths who bring not only capital but also expertise, strategic vision, and a profound understanding of how blockchain can fundamentally alter existing paradigms. Their presence legitimizes the space, attracting further innovation and talent, and steering the narrative towards utility and sustainable growth.
What truly defines this "smart money"? It’s capital that is deeply informed, strategically deployed, and often wields significant influence. These are the entities that meticulously analyze market dynamics, technological potential, and evolving regulatory frameworks. They are the venture capital firms that perform exhaustive due diligence on blockchain startups, the hedge funds that leverage complex algorithmic trading strategies, and the multinational corporations integrating blockchain into their core operations. Their entry signals a transition from purely speculative interest to a more grounded, utility-driven adoption, recognizing that blockchain's potential extends far beyond cryptocurrencies to encompass revolutionary applications in supply chain management, digital identity, intellectual property, and countless other sectors.
The inherent promise of blockchain for smart money lies in its capacity for radical disintermediation and unparalleled efficiency. Traditional financial systems, burdened by legacy infrastructure and bureaucratic layers, often suffer from inefficiencies and high transaction costs. Blockchain offers a paradigm shift: a decentralized, immutable ledger that facilitates peer-to-peer transactions without reliance on central authorities. This translates to drastically reduced costs, accelerated settlement times, and enhanced transparency – all highly attractive prospects for strategic investors. They are backing the companies building the next generation of financial infrastructure, investing in assets with newfound liquidity and programmability, and participating in entirely new economic models.
Venture capital has been an especially potent force in this transformation. Firms that once viewed blockchain with trepidation are now aggressively deploying substantial capital into promising startups. Their focus has broadened beyond cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets to encompass foundational blockchain protocols, decentralized applications (dApps) designed to solve tangible real-world problems, and the critical infrastructure underpinning the burgeoning Web3 ecosystem. These VC investments are rarely passive; they are accompanied by strategic guidance, access to extensive talent networks, and a vested interest in the long-term success of their portfolio companies. The due diligence process is exhaustive, scrutinizing a project’s scalability, security, tokenomics, team expertise, and market viability. The endorsement of reputable VC firms lends crucial credibility, attracting further investment and top-tier talent.
Institutional investors, having initially adopted a wait-and-see approach, are now increasingly acknowledging the undeniable traction and transformative potential of blockchain technology. Asset managers are exploring innovative ways to offer exposure to digital assets to their clientele, and some are actively allocating a portion of their portfolios to cryptocurrencies and other blockchain-based investments. This pivot is fueled by a growing recognition that digital assets are becoming an integral component of the global financial landscape. The development of regulated investment vehicles, such as Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), has been instrumental in bridging the gap between traditional finance and the crypto world, thereby facilitating safer and more accessible institutional participation. Moreover, the prospect of asset tokenization – the representation of real-world assets like real estate, art, or company shares on a blockchain – is opening up novel avenues for liquidity and fractional ownership, an extremely appealing proposition for large-scale investors seeking diversification and new investment horizons.
The "smart money" narrative is intrinsically linked to the very concept of decentralization. While the initial wave of blockchain adoption was often characterized by decentralized, community-driven initiatives, the entry of sophisticated capital introduces a different dynamic. These investors typically aim to build scalable, sustainable businesses, which can sometimes create a tension between the ideal of pure decentralization and the practical need for governance, structure, and effective management. However, it is precisely this strategic involvement that is helping to refine and professionalize the blockchain industry, pushing projects to focus on clear use cases, robust economic models, and long-term value creation. They are betting on the conviction that blockchain technology, guided by intelligent capital, can indeed reshape industries and redefine our interaction with both digital and physical assets.
The algorithmic prowess of smart money is a defining characteristic in the blockchain arena. Beyond simply identifying promising projects, these sophisticated investors are leveraging advanced analytical tools and machine learning to navigate the inherently volatile crypto markets. This includes the development of proprietary trading algorithms capable of executing trades at lightning speed, capitalizing on micro-second price discrepancies and market inefficiencies. These algorithms can process vast datasets – including on-chain metrics, social media sentiment, news feeds, and historical price action – to discern patterns and predict future price movements. This algorithmic approach, a hallmark of traditional finance, signifies a crucial professionalization of the blockchain market.
For smart money, the tokenization of assets represents a frontier brimming with profound opportunity. Envision a future where a piece of fine art, a commercial property, or even a share in a private company can be meticulously represented as a digital token on a blockchain. This process, known as tokenization, promises to unlock unprecedented liquidity for assets that have historically been illiquid. It facilitates fractional ownership, allowing multiple investors to hold a stake in high-value assets, thereby democratizing access to investments that were previously unattainable for the majority. Smart money players are actively exploring and investing in the platforms and infrastructure that streamline tokenization, recognizing its potential to revolutionize asset management and cultivate entirely new markets. Their evaluations are meticulous, focusing on legal frameworks, security protocols, and market demand for tokenized assets, with the aim of establishing a dominant position at the vanguard of this transformative trend.
The realm of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is another significant magnet for smart money. DeFi endeavors to recreate traditional financial services—lending, borrowing, trading, insurance—on decentralized blockchain networks, effectively eliminating intermediaries and empowering users with greater autonomy over their assets. Smart money is drawn to the potential for enhanced yields, increased transparency, and the innovative financial products emerging within the DeFi ecosystem. They are investing in DeFi protocols, liquidity pools, and the underlying infrastructure that underpins these decentralized financial applications. However, this opportunity is accompanied by inherent risks, and smart money is acutely aware of the security vulnerabilities and regulatory uncertainties that still characterize certain segments of the DeFi space. Their involvement often extends to actively contributing to the development of more robust and secure DeFi solutions, either through direct investment or participation in governance mechanisms.
The journey of smart money into blockchain is not devoid of complexity. As capital becomes more concentrated, questions inevitably arise regarding the potential for increased centralization and its impact on the core ethos of decentralization that underpins much of the blockchain movement. The influence wielded by large investors can significantly shape project roadmaps, token distribution strategies, and even governance outcomes. This necessitates a delicate balance between leveraging the power of smart money for growth and innovation, while assiduously preserving the principles of fairness, transparency, and community ownership. Smart money, by its very nature, seeks returns and influence. Understanding how these forces interact with the open-source, permissionless architecture of blockchain is paramount to appreciating the ongoing evolution of this dynamic ecosystem.
Furthermore, the evolving regulatory landscape remains a critical determinant in the decision-making processes of smart money. As institutional adoption escalates, so does the scrutiny from regulatory bodies worldwide. Smart money players are vigilantly monitoring regulatory developments, prioritizing investments in projects that demonstrate an unwavering commitment to compliance and security. They recognize that regulatory clarity is indispensable for the long-term sustainability and widespread adoption of blockchain technology. Their active involvement can even contribute to shaping regulatory discussions, as their extensive experience and insights can inform policies designed to strike an equilibrium between fostering innovation and ensuring investor protection.
In summation, the infusion of smart money into blockchain is a clear testament to the technology's maturation and its undeniable, far-reaching potential. It signifies a decisive transition from a niche, speculative pursuit to a powerful force poised to reshape global finance and technology. The strategies employed are becoming increasingly sophisticated, the investments more deliberate, and the impact progressively more profound. As these intelligent capital flows continue to navigate the blockchain frontier, they are not merely participating in the market; they are actively constructing its future, one strategic investment at a time, guided by advanced algorithms, a clear vision for tokenized assets, and the transformative power of decentralized finance.
Sure, I can help you with that! Here's a soft article on "Decentralized Finance, Centralized Profits," split into two parts as requested.
The siren song of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has captivated the global imagination, whispering promises of a financial future unshackled from the gatekeepers of old. Imagine a world where your assets are truly yours, where lending and borrowing occur peer-to-peer without intermediaries, and where innovative financial instruments are accessible to anyone with an internet connection. This is the utopian vision of DeFi – a revolution built on blockchain technology, powered by smart contracts, and fueled by the inherent transparency and immutability of distributed ledgers.
For years, traditional finance (TradFi) has been characterized by its exclusivity and opacity. Banks, investment firms, and other financial institutions have acted as powerful intermediaries, controlling access to capital, dictating terms, and reaping substantial fees. The rise of cryptocurrencies and the subsequent development of DeFi have presented a compelling alternative, aiming to disintermediate these entrenched players. The core tenets of DeFi are appealing: financial sovereignty, permissionless access, and greater efficiency. Users can stake their cryptocurrency to earn yield, lend assets to borrowers directly, trade on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) without KYC, and participate in the creation of new financial products. The underlying technology, blockchain, offers a robust framework for these activities, ensuring that transactions are recorded and verifiable, and that smart contracts execute predetermined rules automatically, removing the need for trust in a central authority.
Think about the sheer innovation blossoming within the DeFi ecosystem. We've seen the emergence of stablecoins, designed to offer the stability of fiat currency within the volatile crypto market. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are pioneering new models of governance, allowing communities to collectively manage protocols and treasuries. Yield farming and liquidity mining have incentivized participation, offering attractive returns for those willing to contribute their digital assets to the ecosystem. The narrative is one of empowerment, of democratizing access to financial tools that were once the exclusive domain of the wealthy and well-connected. It’s a narrative that resonates deeply in a world often grappling with economic inequality.
However, as DeFi matures, a curious and perhaps inevitable paradox has begun to surface: the very forces that promise decentralization are, in practice, leading to a significant concentration of profits. While the technology is decentralized, the economic realities and network effects often conspire to funnel wealth towards a relatively small group of participants. This isn't to say that DeFi is a failure, far from it. The innovation and potential are undeniable. But understanding where the profits are actually flowing is crucial for a clear-eyed view of this evolving landscape.
One of the primary drivers of this profit centralization is the dominance of certain foundational protocols and platforms. Just as a few tech giants control significant portions of the internet's infrastructure, a handful of major DeFi protocols have become the backbone of the ecosystem. These are the platforms where the vast majority of trading volume occurs, where the largest pools of liquidity reside, and where the most sophisticated yield-generating strategies are deployed. Protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Compound, while decentralized in their governance, have established themselves as indispensable. The native tokens of these protocols have often seen astronomical price appreciation, rewarding early investors and founders disproportionately.
Moreover, the high capital requirements for participating in certain lucrative DeFi activities create a barrier to entry. While DeFi is permissionless in theory, profitable participation often requires significant capital. To earn substantial yields in liquidity provision or staking, one needs to deposit large sums of cryptocurrency. This inherently favors those who already possess significant wealth, whether in traditional assets or digital ones. Small retail investors, while able to participate, may find their returns dwarfed by the sheer scale of institutional or "whale" participation. The concept of "gas fees" on blockchains like Ethereum, while designed to incentivize network validators, can also become a prohibitive cost for small, frequent transactions, further disadvantaging those with less capital.
The venture capital (VC) funding landscape within DeFi also plays a significant role. Many of the most promising DeFi projects have been backed by VCs who often receive a substantial allocation of tokens at a discounted price during their seed or private sale rounds. As these projects gain traction and their tokens appreciate in value, these VCs can realize massive profits, often far exceeding the returns available to the average user. This model, while common in traditional tech startups, introduces a centralized element of wealth accumulation into a space that ostensibly champions decentralization. The VCs are not just investors; they are often influential stakeholders in the projects they fund, potentially shaping development and governance in ways that benefit their investment.
Finally, the role of centralized entities within the DeFi ecosystem itself cannot be ignored. Centralized cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken, while not strictly DeFi in their core operations, are often the primary on-ramps and off-ramps for users entering and exiting the crypto market, including DeFi. These exchanges facilitate the trading of a vast array of cryptocurrencies and tokens, including those used in DeFi protocols. They also offer their own financial products, often leveraging the underlying technologies or trends from DeFi. The profits generated by these centralized entities, from trading fees, listing fees, and their own investment arms, are undeniably concentrated. While they provide crucial accessibility, they also represent a significant locus of profit within the broader crypto and DeFi landscape. This creates a dynamic where the decentralized ideals of DeFi are often filtered through centralized, profit-driven businesses. The user experience can be seamless, but the underlying financial flows remain anything but purely decentralized.
The narrative of Decentralized Finance often paints a picture of a truly open and equitable financial system. However, a closer examination reveals a more complex reality, one where the promise of decentralization coexists with the persistent tendency for profits to aggregate. The very tools and mechanisms designed to foster innovation and user empowerment can, paradoxically, lead to the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few. Understanding these dynamics is key to navigating the evolving DeFi landscape and appreciating its true implications.
Beyond the initial VC funding and the dominance of established protocols, another significant factor contributing to profit centralization is the information asymmetry and the sophisticated strategies employed by early adopters and institutional players. The DeFi space is notoriously complex. Mastering its intricacies, understanding risk management, and executing profitable yield farming or trading strategies requires a level of expertise, time, and computational resources that are not universally available. Those who are "in the know," often comprising seasoned traders, developers, and institutions with dedicated research teams, are better equipped to identify lucrative opportunities and navigate the risks. They can exploit arbitrage opportunities across different DEXs, identify undervalued tokens before they gain mainstream attention, and deploy capital in complex multi-protocol strategies that yield higher returns. This creates a knowledge gap, where those with less experience or resources are more likely to be on the receiving end of less favorable trades or earn lower yields.
Furthermore, the concentration of ownership of governance tokens in many DeFi protocols is a critical element. While these tokens are often distributed to encourage participation and decentralization, they can also become concentrated in the hands of early investors, founders, or large token holders. This concentration of voting power can influence protocol upgrades, fee structures, and treasury allocation decisions in ways that might benefit these large token holders. For instance, if a protocol's governance token is heavily concentrated, a proposal to increase transaction fees or allocate a larger portion of revenue to token holders might pass, further benefiting those who already own a significant stake. While designed for decentralized governance, the reality can sometimes resemble a plutocracy, where economic power translates directly into political power within the protocol.
The "network effect" is another powerful force driving profit centralization. In any ecosystem, platforms and protocols that gain early traction and attract a large user base tend to become self-reinforcing. More users mean more liquidity, which in turn attracts more users and developers. For DEXs, this means deeper order books and lower slippage, making them more attractive for traders. For lending protocols, it means greater depth of available assets and more competitive borrowing rates. As these dominant platforms solidify their positions, it becomes increasingly difficult for new entrants to compete, even if they offer innovative features. The established players capture a larger share of transaction volume and, consequently, a larger share of the fees and profits generated within their niche.
Consider the role of "whale" investors – individuals or entities holding a substantial amount of cryptocurrency. In DeFi, these whales can significantly influence market dynamics and profit streams. Their large positions allow them to participate in yield farming and liquidity provision at scales that generate substantial returns. Moreover, their trading activities can move markets, creating opportunities for themselves and potentially disadvantaging smaller traders who lack the capital to react effectively. When a whale decides to enter or exit a particular DeFi protocol or token, the impact can be substantial, often leading to significant price fluctuations that can be exploited by those with sufficient foresight and capital.
The development of the "DeFi summer" and subsequent market cycles has also highlighted the speculative nature of many DeFi assets and protocols. While innovation is driving much of the underlying technology, the rapid price appreciation of many DeFi tokens has been fueled by speculation and hype, not always by fundamental utility or sustainable revenue generation. This speculative frenzy can lead to massive paper gains for early investors and participants, but these gains are often ephemeral and can evaporate quickly during market downturns. The profits realized during these boom cycles tend to be concentrated among those who are able to time the market effectively or are simply holding assets that experience rapid, speculative growth.
Looking ahead, the question of regulation looms large. As DeFi continues to mature and gain mainstream attention, governments and regulatory bodies are increasingly scrutinizing the space. While the intention behind regulation is often to protect consumers and ensure market stability, it can also inadvertently lead to further centralization. Compliance requirements, such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations, often necessitate the involvement of intermediaries, thus reintroducing elements of centralization. Furthermore, complex regulatory frameworks might be more easily navigated and complied with by larger, well-resourced entities, potentially stifling smaller, more decentralized players and further concentrating market power and profits within established, compliant organizations.
In conclusion, the paradox of "Decentralized Finance, Centralized Profits" is not a contradiction but rather a complex interplay of technological innovation, economic incentives, and human behavior. While DeFi offers a compelling vision of a more open and accessible financial future, the journey towards true decentralization of profits is ongoing. The dominance of key protocols, the high capital requirements, the influence of VCs and whales, network effects, speculative dynamics, and the looming shadow of regulation all contribute to a reality where wealth and power often consolidate. For users and builders in the DeFi space, understanding these forces is not just an intellectual exercise; it is a pragmatic necessity for navigating the opportunities and challenges of this revolutionary frontier and for striving towards a financial system that truly lives up to its decentralized ideals. The dream of DeFi is powerful, but its realization requires a conscious effort to mitigate the forces that tend to centralize its considerable financial rewards.